Casey Anthony found not guilty of murder of daughter

**ninergold** · 07-06-11 at 07:44 PM

[IMG]http://oi55.*************2s9sknl.jpg[/IMG]

To soon? :p

Okay .. this one is better

[IMG]http://oi52.*************e9w2zr.jpg[/IMG]

**lazzyie** · 07-06-11 at 07:49 PM

^^^^LOL never too soon for jokes

**WillowSun** · 07-06-11 at 08:49 PM

Love the dexter joke.

We never heard about this case in Aus, but it reminds us of the baby Azaria/Lindy Chamberlain fiasco (the yanks may recall that famous line "A dingo's got my baby!" from a tele-movie of the story) where the media 'trial', conservative nature of Aus society, and generic FUBAR police investigation had similar results.

BTW, its now believed she was telling the truth.

**PhenomIIX4** · 07-06-11 at 08:56 PM

This reminds me of that Peterson case that happen in Redwood City, CA. He murdered his pregnant wife and dumps the body in the same lake where he goes fishing. He screwed up because he was at the same lake where he reported her missing. If he was smart, then he would have dumped the body somewhere else or go fishing some where else.

I believe she murdered her baby but played it smart. Either way, she owes a crap load of $$$$$$$$ for that lawyer, and she is still a baby killer because she lied in court. She took too long to report her baby was missing. Time to move on.

**tomandsusan** · 07-07-11 at 05:16 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by PhenomIIX4

This reminds me of that Peterson case that happen in Redwood City, CA. He murdered his pregnant wife and dumps the body in the same lake where he goes fishing. He screwed up because he was at the same lake where he reported her missing. If he was smart, then he would have dumped the body somewhere else or go fishing some where else.

I believe she murdered her baby but played it smart. Either way, she owes a crap load of $$$$$$$$ for that lawyer, and she is still a baby killer because she lied in court. She took too long to report her baby was missing. Time to move on.

For one, Peterson could have probably beat the rap if he had just left his wife in the swimming pool and said she accidently drowned. Trying to hide the body is where he screwed up. Another PSYCHOPATH!

For the lawyers fees, the guy is probably a Public Defender - Court Appointed-- which means the good old tax payers will pick up his tab.

**NeoTheKiller** · 07-07-11 at 09:59 AM

EDIT:ADDED MORE INFO

**NeoTheKiller** · 07-07-11 at 10:09 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by mrwhorse

Meh, i thought she was guilty..but oh well I'm sure people get away with murder all the time.

Yep,Just like me(evil sinister laugh)

**ninergold** · 07-07-11 at 11:46 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by PhenomIIX4

....... Either way, she owes a crap load of $$$$$$$$ for that lawyer

He was a public defender. That means the tax payers in Florida paid for her defense.

me3710 · 07-07-11 at 03:05 PM

She is guilty as hell and now there will be no justice for Caylee. The state should force her to undergo and complete hysterectomy so she can never do this to another child.

**bookdragon** · 07-07-11 at 04:05 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by anomander

Tom i know its double jeopardy ( I dont live in a trailer ) mate lol

I was just wanting clarification about if overwhelming NEW evidence came to light she still couldnt be tried in the US again for the same crime?
Kinda silly dont you think?

The below is about a man who was found not guilty of killing a 2 year old then confessed afterward- He is free and his confession mean NADA!

Code: Select All

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0601/27/lkl.01.html

As for the jury in this case I can see them saying that they can't say first degree murder as there is no evidence of premeditation (not to say I don't believe she did not kill her the question is was it accidental) What I can't understand is the man slaughter and child abuse not guilty verdicts. Even if the BS "she drowned " story is true, is it not negligent not to call 911 and try to revive her, but to instead bury her in the woods by your house?

**lvstealth** · 07-07-11 at 04:18 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by ninergold

He was a public defender. That means the tax payers in Florida paid for her defense.

hm... where did you get that info? it appears he had his own firm and was hired by the defendant in 2008. it is not known if he got paid, or how much. many lawyers would do this type thing pro bono. it was probably the best thing that ever happened to Baez, it would not be so bad for him to do it pro bono.

it is like the article mentioning the bikini stuff, it is not really accurate, he did not sell bikinis as such but did legal work for a past site that was involved in bikinis. he also did much work with domestic violence groups, which they forgot to mention at all. he worked in the public defenders office for a stint also, but not at the time this happened.

if the press spews it the public regurgitates it.

it would seem that with the jury not being hung and the deliberation was not incredibly long there is something they saw/heard we are not privy to.

smiles,
Mandy

**Gandolph13** · 07-07-11 at 04:58 PM

Quote:

it would seem that with the jury not being hung and the deliberation was not incredibly long there is something they saw/heard we are not privy to.

So should a jury not being well hung have anything to do with a murder trial?
Thanks for noticing Mandy, they obviously have no b@lls!

**lvstealth** · 07-07-11 at 05:44 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by Gandolph13

So should a jury not being well hung have anything to do with a murder trial?
Thanks for noticing Mandy, they obviously have no b@lls!

hehe... a hung jury... guffaw!

i like when you triple your meds!
Mandy

**Gandolph13** · 07-09-11 at 11:57 PM

This claim by many perpetrators of inexcusable monstrous/atrocious behaviour and attacks against innocent children is nothing more than a sympathy stunt portrayed and orchestrated by low life, win at all cost defence teams.

As an adult survivor of atrocious childhood abuse, my former psychologist explained to me that all the scum who attack innocent children are offered this excuse by their lawyers to lessen their sentences and make their behaviour excusable.

She simply asked me with what I had been through as a child, could I ever do this to another child. I was horrified she would even ask me that, but after I screamed "of course I couldn't" she explained neither could any other person who went through what I went through as a child.

What most people don't realise about victims of this behaviour, their lives are never normal, they are never more than a split second thought away from another suicide attempt/hard drugs/the road to ruin.

My psychologist used to visit the major prison responsible for paedophile incarceration in Australia and she told me how the scum used to laugh at her about how they got 2-3 year sentences after offering this defence and having the courts sympathy. It's nothing more than bullshit.

Quote:

I was abused as a child so it's all I know.

Crap, I was abused as a child and I could never inflict that sort of pain/torture on another human being, and my life has been totally f**ked up because of my childhood!

07-07-11 at 04:05 PM	#52
bookdragon She Dragon Extraordinaire Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: In the bowels of the Earth Posts: 2,678	Quote: Originally Posted by anomander Tom i know its double jeopardy ( I dont live in a trailer ) mate lol I was just wanting clarification about if overwhelming NEW evidence came to light she still couldnt be tried in the US again for the same crime? Kinda silly dont you think? The below is about a man who was found not guilty of killing a 2 year old then confessed afterward- He is free and his confession mean NADA! Code: Select All http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0601/27/lkl.01.html As for the jury in this case I can see them saying that they can't say first degree murder as there is no evidence of premeditation (not to say I don't believe she did not kill her the question is was it accidental) What I can't understand is the man slaughter and child abuse not guilty verdicts. Even if the BS "she drowned " story is true, is it not negligent not to call 911 and try to revive her, but to instead bury her in the woods by your house?

07-06-11 at 07:44 PM	#43
ninergold Novice Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: USA Posts: 115	[IMG]http://oi55.***********2s9sknl.jpg[/IMG] To soon? :p Okay .. this one is better [IMG]http://oi52.***********e9w2zr.jpg[/IMG]

07-06-11 at 07:49 PM	#44
lazzyie Hopelessly Lost Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 1,210	^^^^LOL never too soon for jokes

07-06-11 at 08:49 PM	#45
WillowSun Therianthrope Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 5,023	Love the dexter joke. We never heard about this case in Aus, but it reminds us of the baby Azaria/Lindy Chamberlain fiasco (the yanks may recall that famous line "A dingo's got my baby!" from a tele-movie of the story) where the media 'trial', conservative nature of Aus society, and generic FUBAR police investigation had similar results. BTW, its now believed she was telling the truth.

07-06-11 at 08:56 PM	#46
PhenomIIX4 Banned Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Socket AM2+ Posts: 3,562	This reminds me of that Peterson case that happen in Redwood City, CA. He murdered his pregnant wife and dumps the body in the same lake where he goes fishing. He screwed up because he was at the same lake where he reported her missing. If he was smart, then he would have dumped the body somewhere else or go fishing some where else. I believe she murdered her baby but played it smart. Either way, she owes a crap load of $$$$$$$$ for that lawyer, and she is still a baby killer because she lied in court. She took too long to report her baby was missing. Time to move on.

07-07-11 at 05:16 AM	#47
tomandsusan Guru Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Never Never Land Posts: 5,748	Quote: Originally Posted by PhenomIIX4 This reminds me of that Peterson case that happen in Redwood City, CA. He murdered his pregnant wife and dumps the body in the same lake where he goes fishing. He screwed up because he was at the same lake where he reported her missing. If he was smart, then he would have dumped the body somewhere else or go fishing some where else. I believe she murdered her baby but played it smart. Either way, she owes a crap load of $$$$$$$$ for that lawyer, and she is still a baby killer because she lied in court. She took too long to report her baby was missing. Time to move on. For one, Peterson could have probably beat the rap if he had just left his wife in the swimming pool and said she accidently drowned. Trying to hide the body is where he screwed up. Another PSYCHOPATH! For the lawyers fees, the guy is probably a Public Defender - Court Appointed-- which means the good old tax payers will pick up his tab.

07-07-11 at 09:59 AM	#48
NeoTheKiller Emperor Of Emperor's Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Hell's Road Posts: 1,926	EDIT:ADDED MORE INFO

07-07-11 at 10:09 AM	#49
NeoTheKiller Emperor Of Emperor's Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Hell's Road Posts: 1,926	Quote: Originally Posted by mrwhorse Meh, i thought she was guilty..but oh well I'm sure people get away with murder all the time. Yep,Just like me(evil sinister laugh)

07-07-11 at 11:46 AM	#50
ninergold Novice Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: USA Posts: 115	Quote: Originally Posted by PhenomIIX4 ....... Either way, she owes a crap load of $$$$$$$$ for that lawyer He was a public defender. That means the tax payers in Florida paid for her defense.

07-07-11 at 03:05 PM	#51
me3710 Newcomer Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 52	She is guilty as hell and now there will be no justice for Caylee. The state should force her to undergo and complete hysterectomy so she can never do this to another child.

07-07-11 at 04:18 PM	#53
lvstealth Give me your Glow juice.. Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Tennessee, USA Posts: 5,126	Quote: Originally Posted by ninergold He was a public defender. That means the tax payers in Florida paid for her defense. hm... where did you get that info? it appears he had his own firm and was hired by the defendant in 2008. it is not known if he got paid, or how much. many lawyers would do this type thing pro bono. it was probably the best thing that ever happened to Baez, it would not be so bad for him to do it pro bono. it is like the article mentioning the bikini stuff, it is not really accurate, he did not sell bikinis as such but did legal work for a past site that was involved in bikinis. he also did much work with domestic violence groups, which they forgot to mention at all. he worked in the public defenders office for a stint also, but not at the time this happened. if the press spews it the public regurgitates it. it would seem that with the jury not being hung and the deliberation was not incredibly long there is something they saw/heard we are not privy to. smiles, Mandy

07-07-11 at 04:58 PM	#54
Gandolph13 Legendary Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Australia (GMT+10) Posts: 12,331	Quote: it would seem that with the jury not being hung and the deliberation was not incredibly long there is something they saw/heard we are not privy to. So should a jury not being well hung have anything to do with a murder trial? Thanks for noticing Mandy, they obviously have no b@lls!

07-07-11 at 05:44 PM	#55
lvstealth Give me your Glow juice.. Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Tennessee, USA Posts: 5,126	Quote: Originally Posted by Gandolph13 So should a jury not being well hung have anything to do with a murder trial? Thanks for noticing Mandy, they obviously have no b@lls! hehe... a hung jury... guffaw! i like when you triple your meds! Mandy

07-09-11 at 11:57 PM	#56
Gandolph13 Legendary Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Australia (GMT+10) Posts: 12,331	This claim by many perpetrators of inexcusable monstrous/atrocious behaviour and attacks against innocent children is nothing more than a sympathy stunt portrayed and orchestrated by low life, win at all cost defence teams. As an adult survivor of atrocious childhood abuse, my former psychologist explained to me that all the scum who attack innocent children are offered this excuse by their lawyers to lessen their sentences and make their behaviour excusable. She simply asked me with what I had been through as a child, could I ever do this to another child. I was horrified she would even ask me that, but after I screamed "of course I couldn't" she explained neither could any other person who went through what I went through as a child. What most people don't realise about victims of this behaviour, their lives are never normal, they are never more than a split second thought away from another suicide attempt/hard drugs/the road to ruin. My psychologist used to visit the major prison responsible for paedophile incarceration in Australia and she told me how the scum used to laugh at her about how they got 2-3 year sentences after offering this defence and having the courts sympathy. It's nothing more than bullshit. Quote: I was abused as a child so it's all I know. Crap, I was abused as a child and I could never inflict that sort of pain/torture on another human being, and my life has been totally fked up because of my childhood!**