[MULTI] New! Star Wars V: The Empire Strikes Back DTS-HD Master Audio 6.1 English Audio Track

**raster43** · 06-19-12 at 02:04 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by majko8109

in my signature

Ah, you just beat me to it majko. I was typing the link to your thread just as you posted it !

sortom · 06-19-12 at 02:23 PM

Thanks majko but ı have a problem for Star Wars and Alien saga. Are they realy dts hd ma the files 1510 kps. I checked the DTS version they are also 1510kbps.And the file in this thread is over 4000 kbps.Thanks again.

sortom · 06-19-12 at 02:27 PM

For Alien

DTS-HD Master Audio English 3412 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 3412 kbps in bluray iso file

In your thread

DTS-HD Master / Core, 6 Channel(s), BitRate_Maximum/String:2 236 Kbps / 1 510 Kbps, Sampling rate:48,0 KHz, Bit depth:24 bits

**raster43** · 06-19-12 at 02:52 PM

Hmmm, good point sortom. 99% of the Alien releases I've seen were 3412 and a couple were 3385. Depending on the country where it was encoded/released.

I must admit I've never seen 2236 before, other than his thread. I'd be real curious what country that came from and how it can be truly lossless at that low a bitrate (compared to the others)

sortom · 06-19-12 at 03:03 PM

And also the Star wars in his thread is 1500 kbps.As you say before it can t be DTS hd ma.But he writes *in dts-hd master audios the bitrate is much much higher(each file more than 4000kbps),mediainfo scan not entire file so it is not accurately measured*
to his thread this means the measuremnts will seem wrong?.Because the files are so big espacially the Lord of the rings extended s.I have the dts Es version and it s 2.4 gb but his files 390mb*23 parts over 6 gb.

**raster43** · 06-19-12 at 03:08 PM

I would say that the Star Wars is clearly a mistype. He typed the core value twice instead of the avg bitrate.

sortom · 06-19-12 at 03:12 PM

Thanks for your help:)

**majko8109** · 06-19-12 at 09:49 PM

GUYS,guys you have to mux it to the BD structure and you will see thaht bitrate is much higher. I been shocked

that you see this for first time.Matroska scans i thing first 5seconds that way is so small i post it on the begginig of the thread. You have to lot to learn.

sortom · 06-20-12 at 02:56 AM

sorry majko:) please don t breake your head:)))) understood finally:))))))))))

**BaronV** · 10-25-12 at 04:31 AM

thanks raster! so far the netload links seem to be up :)

however shouldnt the extension be .dtshd instead? At least thats how dts-hd master suite encoder does it...

**raster43** · 10-25-12 at 08:09 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by BaronV

thanks raster! so far the netload links seem to be up :)

however shouldnt the extension be .dtshd instead? At least thats how dts-hd master suite encoder does it...

No, DTS is correct. DTSHD extension is the Suite's result with the hex offset, used by authoring houses. It's never used in a final BD. (muxing, via Tsmuxer, corrects what's been created by DTS MA Suite)

The posted track is direct from a post of the movie, containing the HD track, as stated in the op.
PM sent.

Edit: Note that a HD *.dtshd file can be played by the HD Stream Player, however, a HD *.dts file can not. (it's all distorted)

ZheParadox · 3 Weeks Ago at 07:38 PM

wow!
thanks so much!

10-25-12 at 08:09 AM	#39
raster43 "Master" Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: 3rd Rock From The Sun Posts: 1,294	Quote: Originally Posted by BaronV thanks raster! so far the netload links seem to be up :) however shouldnt the extension be .dtshd instead? At least thats how dts-hd master suite encoder does it... No, DTS is correct. DTSHD extension is the Suite's result with the hex offset, used by authoring houses. It's never used in a final BD. (muxing, via Tsmuxer, corrects what's been created by DTS MA Suite) The posted track is direct from a post of the movie, containing the HD track, as stated in the op. PM sent. Edit: Note that a HD .dtshd file can be played by the HD Stream Player, however, a HD .dts file can not. (it's all distorted) Last edited by raster43; 10-25-12 at 11:46 AM.

06-19-12 at 02:04 PM	#29
raster43 "Master" Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: 3rd Rock From The Sun Posts: 1,294	Quote: Originally Posted by majko8109 in my signature Ah, you just beat me to it majko. I was typing the link to your thread just as you posted it !

06-19-12 at 02:23 PM	#30
sortom Newcomer Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 31	Thanks majko but ı have a problem for Star Wars and Alien saga. Are they realy dts hd ma the files 1510 kps. I checked the DTS version they are also 1510kbps.And the file in this thread is over 4000 kbps.Thanks again.

06-19-12 at 02:27 PM	#31
sortom Newcomer Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 31	For Alien DTS-HD Master Audio English 3412 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 3412 kbps in bluray iso file In your thread DTS-HD Master / Core, 6 Channel(s), BitRate_Maximum/String:2 236 Kbps / 1 510 Kbps, Sampling rate:48,0 KHz, Bit depth:24 bits

06-19-12 at 02:52 PM	#32
raster43 "Master" Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: 3rd Rock From The Sun Posts: 1,294	Hmmm, good point sortom. 99% of the Alien releases I've seen were 3412 and a couple were 3385. Depending on the country where it was encoded/released. I must admit I've never seen 2236 before, other than his thread. I'd be real curious what country that came from and how it can be truly lossless at that low a bitrate (compared to the others)

06-19-12 at 03:03 PM	#33
sortom Newcomer Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 31	And also the Star wars in his thread is 1500 kbps.As you say before it can t be DTS hd ma.But he writes in dts-hd master audios the bitrate is much much higher(each file more than 4000kbps),mediainfo scan not entire file so it is not accurately measured to his thread this means the measuremnts will seem wrong?.Because the files are so big espacially the Lord of the rings extended s.I have the dts Es version and it s 2.4 gb but his files 390mb*23 parts over 6 gb.

06-19-12 at 03:08 PM	#34
raster43 "Master" Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: 3rd Rock From The Sun Posts: 1,294	I would say that the Star Wars is clearly a mistype. He typed the core value twice instead of the avg bitrate.

06-19-12 at 03:12 PM	#35
sortom Newcomer Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 31	Thanks for your help:)

06-19-12 at 09:49 PM	#36
majko8109 Novice Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: SLOVAKIA Posts: 111	GUYS,guys you have to mux it to the BD structure and you will see thaht bitrate is much higher. I been shocked that you see this for first time.Matroska scans i thing first 5seconds that way is so small i post it on the begginig of the thread. You have to lot to learn.

06-20-12 at 02:56 AM	#37
sortom Newcomer Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 31	sorry majko:) please don t breake your head:)))) understood finally:))))))))))

10-25-12 at 04:31 AM	#38
BaronV Novice Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 163	thanks raster! so far the netload links seem to be up :) however shouldnt the extension be .dtshd instead? At least thats how dts-hd master suite encoder does it...

3 Weeks Ago at 07:38 PM	#40
ZheParadox Newcomer Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 78	wow! thanks so much!